Which of the following is NOT a requirement related to the enforcement of a non-competition agreement?

The assertion that a non-competition agreement's restraint is indefinitely valid is not a requirement as such agreements must generally be limited in duration to be enforceable. Courts typically evaluate non-competition agreements based on the reasonableness of various factors, including the duration of the restraint. If an agreement lacks a specific timeframe or is set to last indefinitely, it may be deemed overly broad and therefore unenforceable.

Conversely, having a reasonable geographic area, protecting the employer's competitive interests, and placing reasonable limitations on the types of employment covered are all essential elements that contribute to the agreement's validity. These aspects help ensure that the agreement is not excessively restrictive and aligns with legitimate business interests while still allowing the former employee to find employment. This balancing act is vital for such agreements to be upheld in a legal context.